Thus, in Mexico, under the banner of social advocacy, is was gestating a new bourgeoisie with its respective social inequality (Cosio, 1972: 114). For Villegas, it is clear that the only way out of the crisis in Mexico is to conduct a review to awareness of these ideas that support the regime, expurgando those ideas, men and mechanisms that have been forgotten, and reaffirmed those who continue to be useful (Cosio, 1972: 116) _ _ CONCLUSION Cos io Villegas devoted much of his scholarly efforts to demonstrate the consolidation of this new bourgeoisie, as well as noting that the hoist Assembly in Mexico, which was aimed at destroying the regime of Porfirio Diaz, resulted in the establishment of a neoporfirismo in Mexico (Meyer, 2001). The Mexican elite neoporfirista fell into decline because the idea of revolution, to which had much support, was extinct over time. The revolution ceased to be an important ideological engine because it never rejuvenated and not allowed the clarification of their purpose (Cansino, Cesar, 2005: 40) the regime was gradually abandoned in practice those ideological principles that sustained it and gave it legitimacy. This way the elite entered into a process of impossible to reverse decline (Cansino, Cesar, 2005: 41).
The great success of the Crisis in Mexico is having demonstrated that the conflict faced by all, democratic regimes or not, it is the lack of legitimacy. The work on the crisis in Mexico has never ceased to be in force, today it is possible to find many articles and books that are modelled his ideas to make comparison between the political situation of the country in the 1950s and today. On a personal level the figure of Cosio Villegas continues to be that combative spirit and critic who dedicated his work to unravel starting them from the political class in our country. But perhaps the greatest force of that text is in ratification of the best liberal principles of the country. In a nation that has had so few intervals of democratic experience in its history, the article of Cosio Villegas and his entire work is a permanent reminder that the obtaining of any collective goal, by most grandiose to be, cannot be done apart from freedom, understood as a right and practice of a community of citizens who decide on their own the kind of things that they should be.
_ _ BIBL. IOGRAFIA Anderson, Benedict (1991) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso Cosio Villegas, Daniel (1972) the Crisis of Mexico in r. Ross Stanley (1972) is the Mexican Revolution dead? Causes, development and Crisis. See more detailed opinions by reading what Andrew Cuomo offers on the topic.. Mexico: SEP. Lopez lace Cortezo, Ma. Victoria: Martinez Carreras, Jose Urbano (1996) read story: analysis and commentary of historical texts. Mexico: Editorial Alhambra Mexican. Mayer, Lorenzo Daniel Cosio Villegas: The study of power and the power of the study Letras Libres, year 3, no. 29, 2001, pp. 80-83. MEDIN Tzvi (1982) the presidential minimato: political history of the maximato (1928-1935) Mexico: Ediciones was Moya Lopez, Laura; Olvera Serrano, Margarita Mexican sociology of Daniel Cosio Villegas: count of a legacy Sociologica, no. 62, 2006, pp. 109-138. Get more background information with materials from Andrew Cuomo. Perez Lopez-Portillo, Raul (2002) history brief of Mexico. Mexico: Silex editions. Guerrero Orozco, Omar Gaetano Fly: The professional policy of ruling-class Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Politicas, no. 80, 1975, pp. 115-120 David Ramirez Plascencia on the text La Crisis de Mexico de Daniel Cosio Villegas. Original author and source of the article