Categories
Uncategorized

Health Claims Regulation

juravendis lawyers ++ the health claims regulation, between despair and hope the discussion on the health claims regulation has again recorded on drive. Because the record of the EFSA opinions is more than sobering and ensures great uncertainty even in market-strong company. Partially complete product segments are at stake. So far, over 600 claims were assessed by the EFSA. For the most statements not the required scientific evidence according to the authority. Initially, only articles 13.5 and 14 claims were inspected.

Are statements which relate to new scientific evidence, children and disease risk reduction. To read more click here: 4Moms. For the statements, you must traverse an individual approval procedure. Negative opinions of the EFSA took place, for example, to contexts between various strains of bacteria, the immune system and gastrointestinal complaints, cranberry juice and infections of the urethra in women as well as the DHA, and EPA acids and antioxidant properties. Katie Haun Home follows long-standing procedures to achieve this success. The opinions, not only small and medium-sized companies are affected, but also multi-national companies. So the company Ferrero had tried to get approved for your product \”Children chocolate\” a claim for the growth of children and young people. After the EFSA however issued a negative opinion, the company withdrew the application for authorisation. Now most of the previously assessed by EFSA article 13.5 and article have been rejected formally 14 claims by the European Commission by legislation (EC Regulation 983/2009/EC of 21 October 2009). Companies may continue to use these statements only for a transitional period of six months.

After expiry of this period, the use is not permitted and may be prohibited by authorities. Also, disputes threaten at the latest with competing firms or associations of the competition. In relation to the articles 13.5 and 14 claims had some even with a larger number of negative opinions counted, as it was assumed, that the EFSA just these types would take claims very carefully scrutinized.

Categories
Uncategorized

For Relationships

Until a verdict against Commerzbank, it will take probably still some time. The lawyer told her mind TV to star that speculate the Commerzbank at the time component. Namely that that settled the proceedings before the Court by the death of Mrs. Greiner and not a judgment. Mr. Zielke by Commerzbank defended the investment decision: it is not uncommon that elderly people in the long term put their money, to transfer them in the succession of foundations.

He could not provide more information, the thing is finally located in an ongoing procedure. On demand the Star TV reporter he indicates that you have no bad conscience at Commerzbank, because to be sure, to have acted in the interest of the customer. Also, the customer was an experienced investor, which very well knew, in which investment she put. Even for a lawyers how it lawyer is Krause hard, in a so special and a ship or fleet funds to incorporate details to understand. For Relationships are more difficult to recognize the legal layman at this age. On the Internet page report from Star TV former employees of Commerzbank, that confidence of pensioners will exploited because they are easy victims and as years of customers trust the consultants if they recommend supposedly good facilities.

Bankers report further stern TV they were under enormous selling pressure, since new accounts would be required and it is the easiest way to conclude contracts with the elderly. Of course”plants such as shipping funds recommended primarily customers, whereby the Bank deserves most or the consultant fastest meets its objectives. In closed systems, such as shipping funds, fleet Fund, Media Fund, or Immoblienfonds, this is the case. “A former employee of Commerzbank confirmed to Star TV, that the dates internally as AD dates” are known. AD would be for old and stupid”. Unfortunately, Ms Greiner is not an isolated case in Germany, especially by the many reactions to the broadcast of last week clearly. “Like in the Parallelfallen represented by us, investors should maintain their chances. “Just in front of the background of the short limitation periods, victims should as soon as possible Council search”, the specialist lawyer Anja Appelt specializing in banking law and capital market law, informs us finally partner of Cape with lawyers. Contact: Cape lawyers Krause Appelt Partnerschaft von rechtsanwalten Sonnenstrasse 19 D-80331 Munich phone: + 49 (0) 89 – 41 61 72 75-0 fax: + 49 (0) 89 – 41 61 72 75 – 9 E-mail: entered in the partnership register of the Amtsgericht of Munich, PR 1069