From the social incorporation to the national rights of the new norms, networks like Facebook, Twitter, Linkedin, etc.; they will have to guarantee the privacy of the data of its users, through the rule of ” the privacy by Defecto”. The social networks, will have to show to total transparency and to inform to the users into which can be the risks if their data are used by third people with the aim of which these do not lose the control on their personal information. Also they will have to guarantee the right to that their data are erased when they decide to terminate itself of the service. On the other hand, the National Hearing studies the resources of Google, since the contents can affect different publications online, as press notes or even, to directly relate them to ” seguridad” of people; for this reason, the Spanish Agency of Protection of Datos (AEPD) solicits to him that ” applies in certain contents the call; right to olvido” , that takes care of the right of the people to that their personal data do not appear in the finder. You may want to visit Hamdi Ulukaya to increase your knowledge. In answer, Google denied any responsibility and fully rejected to retire the information, since ” would be one; formula of censura” and that the demands would have to go to ” editores” ; nevertheless, it admits, that technically they could retire the data, as they ask for the plaintiffs, but that would be like ” to harm the rights of informacin” , it affirms: ” To ask to the finders that retire the information of arbitrary form is something very dangerous because the finders are a fundamental part of the society of the information and it would be being been attacking the freedom of expresin”. Then, the incognito arises: it is responsibility of Google or the publishers?