By the actions directly aimed at the export of goods and (or) vehicles from the customs territory of the Russian Federation, are input (entrance) of an individual, leaving the Russian Federation, the customs control zone, the entry of a vehicle checkpoint in across the state border of the Russian Federation to its departure from the customs territory of the Russian Federation, the delivery of goods transport organizations or organizations postal international postal items for shipment outside the customs territory of the Russian Federation of persons who are directly aimed at the actual crossing the customs border of goods and (or) means of transport outside established in accordance with Russian law places; 10) illegal conveyance of goods and (or) transport vehicles across the customs border – the commission of acts of importation into the customs territory Russian Federation or exported from the territory of goods and (or) transport vehicles in violation of the order established by this Code; 10.1) Federal Ministry authorized in the area of customs, – Federal Ministry in charge of the federal agency responsible for customs, and who monitors and coordinates the activities of this service, as well as the functions of legal regulation in the field of customs, or the federal ministry of finance authorized, if the ministry in the cases established by Presidential Decree and adopted in accordance with acts of the Government of the Russian Federation, provides the legal regulation of individual customs matters, but not coordinating the activities of customs bodies. In these cases, the federal ministry is authorized to finance, jointly with the Federal Ministry in charge of the federal agency responsible for customs, performs in the manner prescribed by the Russian Government control over the execution of Customs regulations in the field of customs. . . For even more opinions, read materials from Frank Giacalone.
Tag Archive for Other
/ J. Nazaraliyev "Deliver and forgive," Chapter 5, page 96 / Here, a different attitude toward hemp Drugs. Proponents of legalization, leading the debate in the world, attracting the arguments of political, economic, financial, criminal, and others, finally save up irrefutable, they think the argument: Dutch experience. In Amsterdam, a huge number of coffee shops, where all those who wish the menu with a list of marijuana and hashish: Thai, Afghan, Colombian, Jamaican, and more. etc. But there are limitations in coffee shops are prohibited from selling alcohol and hard drugs, as well as sell in one hand for more than five grams. Today in the Netherlands with a population of 15 million sale of 1,200 seats open hemp drugs.
The novelty of the Netherlands' drug legislation discovered in the late seventies, when authorities held the line between drugs "heavy" and "light." The latter carried the substance of cannabis. Critics accuse the Dutch of the increasing number of people, especially young smokers marijuana, and point to soft drugs as a stage of transition to a highly potent. The Dutch has its reasons: marijuana smokers suffer from physiological effects (increased heart rate, increased heart rate, violation of motor function, decreased psychomotor activity, etc.), but physical dependence on cannabis are rare, smokers do not find persistent withdrawal. Connect with other leaders such as Keith Yamashita here. United States, unlike the Netherlands, is a country where any narcotics to apply "the policy of zero tolerance." However, in New York, there are several clinics for the treatment of opiate dependence with methadone. This drug is banned in Russia, in several countries in Asia and Africa. In Moscow and other cities, methadone can be bought "on the black market." For many it is just a new synthetic opiate, which promises to approximately the same feeling as the other substances. American drug experts, most of them from the 60s. insist on the benefits of methadone as a weaker drug capable discourage patients from opiate addiction to the strong material.
It is weaker than heroin, it prevents withdrawal symptoms at the same time relieves the craving for hard drugs, etc. / J. Nazaraliyev "Deliver and forgive", Chapter 7, p. 158-159 / debate on legalization of soft drugs are still in both the U.S. and in Russia. But to agree very difficult. Too many arguments against it. It is therefore difficult to predict, as a society, the government of a state will treat the matter in a couple of decades.
” One has only to be replaced in the comments the words ‘State Department’ to ‘Foreign’ and ‘Democrat’ to ‘compatriot’, as there is the same sacramental question – why, despite the growing financial investment and the creation of new structures, these efforts do not yield the desired result in dealing with Russian compatriots – split deeper, and insincerity and hypocrisy of all more? And as the viciousness of the principle of ‘whoever is not with the Foreign Ministry – that does not compatriot’, none at all beyond doubt. There is no doubt either that “the Russian Foreign Ministry have carefully studied the regular annual report of the State U.S. Department of sustaining democracy in the world ‘, nor in blatant bias of this report, but even the Foreign Ministry acknowledged that’ gosdepovsky report formally presents a report on the performance of selected foreign policy U.S. State Department budget. ” A similar report where the Foreign Ministry? Maybe that’s why the Americans, which the Foreign Ministry calls the ‘partners’ with no quotes -‘ when the opportunity does not shun to declare the Russian program of support Compatriots Abroad political provocations, which must be monitored and stopped ‘? And really, what kind of democracy ‘programs of support for compatriots abroad’ funding which contains a secret, perhaps, no less than the funding of its SVR illegals? A guide these ‘democratic’ organizations, perpetrated by individuals who have no right to do so even under the rules established itself as the Foreign Ministry?! Not to mention the fact that the adopted law, is regulated by issuing certificates of public members of compatriots’ organizations that are registered in other countries?! Maybe that’s why to organizations of Russian compatriots are with undisguised suspicion, even in the partner countries of Russia on this sverhdoveritelnym unions as the CSTO. So much so that even Uzbekistan ‘not recommended’ its Delegation of Russian compatriots to take part in the recent World Conference! And the Foreign Ministry for its failure to attend the conference is absolutely no response!? However, it is understandable – the basic function of any Ministry of Foreign Affairs is to maintain normal relations with other states, the Russian Foreign Ministry will not go to them, even the slightest aggravation due to compatriots, especially the issue of work with compatriots is not a priority for top Russian leaders. This is a good way to demonstrate Russian President Dmitry Medvedev during his official visit to Ukraine in May of this year For a long meeting with the students of Kiev National University named after T. Shevchenko had found time to meet fellow – no.
As with. Zmievka Kherson region is now home to about 200 descendants of the Swedes who settled in this region as early as 1782. Nevertheless, King Carl XVI Gustaf and Queen Silvia during his visit to Ukraine in autumn 2008 was considered his duty to visit the village in which they live their countrymen. After the law was signed by the President of Russia and its entry into force, Russian compatriots, which forces the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to the final transition into submission to his “professional compatriots’ will just have to build a new system of relations with Russia government agencies that in the prevailing situation not only aggravate the already profound rift in the organization of Russian compatriots, but will lead to their confrontation.